David Lametti
Member of Parliament for LaSalle—Émard—Verdun, Quebec, from 2015 to 2024. Liberal. Cast 1,981 ballots in recorded divisions and voted against the party line 5 times.
Service
| Riding | Province | Party | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LaSalle—Émard—Verdun | QC | Liberal | 2015-10-19 | 2024-01-31 |
Ballots cast by year
One bar per calendar year: recorded divisions where David Lametti voted yea or nay. Absences and pairings are not ballots and are not drawn. Votes against the party line, if any, are the lit slice at the base of the bar.
Against the party line
Every recorded division where David Lametti voted against the majority of their own caucus — all 5 of them, in full, because a count without its list is a claim and not a record.
| Date | Vote | Party | Division |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-05-30 | Yea | Liberal | C-14 · Vote No. 65, session 42-1 — no description in the source dump |
| 2016-05-30 | Yea | Liberal | C-14 · Vote No. 68, session 42-1 — no description in the source dump |
| 2016-05-31 | Nay | Liberal | C-14 · That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass. |
| 2016-06-16 | Yea | Liberal | C-14 · That the motion be amended by: ( a) deleting the paragraph commencing with the words “respectfully disagrees with amendments numbered 2(b), 2(c)(ii), and 2(c)(iii)”; and ( b) replacing the words “agrees with amendments numbered 1, 2(d), 2(e), 4, and 5” with the words “agrees with amendments numbered 1, 2(b), 2(c)(ii), 2(c)(iii), 2(d), 2(e), 4, and 5”. |
| 2016-06-16 | Nay | Liberal | C-14 · That a Message be sent to the Senate to acquaint their Honours that this House: agrees with the amendments numbered 1, 2(d), 2(e), 4, and 5 made by the Senate to Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and to make related amendments to other Acts (medical assistance in dying); proposes that amendment 2(c)(i) be amended by replacing the text of the amendment with the following text “sistance in dying after having been informed of the means that are available to relieve their suffering, including palliative care.”; proposes that amendment 3 be amended in paragraph (b) by adding after the words “make regulations” the words “that he or she considers necessary”; respectfully disagrees with amendment 2(a) because requiring that a person who assists to be free from any material benefit arising from the patient's death would eliminate from participation the family members or friends most likely to be present at the patient's express wish, and this would violate patient autonomy in a fundamental and inacceptable manner; and respectfully disagrees with amendments 2(b), 2(c)(ii), and 2(c)(iii) because they would undermine objectives in Bill C-14 to recognize the significant and continuing public health issue of suicide, to guard against death being seen as a solution to all forms of suffering, and to counter negative perceptions about the quality of life of persons who are elderly, ill or disabled, and because the House is of the view that C-14 strikes the right balance for Canadians between protection of vulnerable individuals and choice for those whose medical circumstances cause enduring and intolerable suffering as they approach death. |
Elections
| Date | Riding | Party | Votes | Share | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-10-19 | LaSalle—Émard—Verdun (QC) | Liberal | 23,603 | 43.90% | elected |
| 2019-10-21 | LaSalle—Émard—Verdun (QC) | Liberal | 22,803 | 43.50% | elected |
| 2021-09-20 | LaSalle—Émard—Verdun (QC) | Liberal | 20,330 | 42.93% | elected |
Method
A ballot is a yea or a nay. Absences (239 here) and pairings (6) are recorded but are not votes, and every rate on this page divides by ballots cast, never by divisions held.
A dissent is a caucus dissent. Ballots cast while sitting as an Independent are never counted as dissents — an Independent has no party line to defy. The source dump flags 61 such ballots anyway; this site excludes them, and documents the artefact in correction 0001.
The record has edges. Memberships and Hansard begin 1994-01-17; recorded divisions begin 2006-05-08. A member who served before that date shows zero ballots because the record starts there, not because they never voted.
Alphabetical, not ranked. The directory sorts by family name. This site does not rank, score, or grade people.