The Fire Computer

Member record/Thornhill · ON/Layer 1 — verifiable fact/Built 2026-08-13

Peter Kent

Member of Parliament for Thornhill, Ontario, from 2008 to 2021. Conservative. Cast 2,351 ballots in recorded divisions and voted against the party line 11 times.

ballots cast2,3511,043 yea · 1,308 nay against party line110.47% of cast hansard statements3,8682008–2021 elections54 won

Service

RidingProvincePartyFromTo
ThornhillONConservative2008-11-182021-09-20

Ballots cast by year

One bar per calendar year: recorded divisions where Peter Kent voted yea or nay. Absences and pairings are not ballots and are not drawn. Votes against the party line, if any, are the lit slice at the base of the bar.

333020082021
The axis starts at zero. The division record runs 2006-05-08 to 2026-06-18.

Against the party line

Every recorded division where Peter Kent voted against the majority of their own caucus — all 11 of them, in full, because a count without its list is a claim and not a record.

DateVotePartyDivision
2015-02-04NayConservativeC-518 · That Bill C-518, An Act to amend the Members of Parliament Retiring Allowances Act (withdrawal allowance), as amended, be concurred in at report stage [with a further amendment/with further amendments].
2016-05-30NayConservativeC-14 · “(d) their imminent natural death has become foreseeable, taking into account all of their medical circumstances.”
2016-05-30YeaConservativeC-14 · Vote No. 68, session 42-1 — no description in the source dump
2016-05-31YeaConservativeC-14 · That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following: “Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and to make related amendments to other Acts (medical assistance in dying), be not now read a third time but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights for the purpose of reconsidering Clause 3 with a view to ensuring that the eligibility criteria contained therein are consistent with the constitutional parameters set out by the Supreme Court in its Carter v. Canada decision.”.
2016-05-31YeaConservativeC-14 · That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
2016-06-01YeaConservativeC-210 · That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage.
2016-06-15YeaConservativeC-210 · That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
2016-06-16YeaConservativeC-14 · That the motion be amended by: ( a) deleting the paragraph commencing with the words “respectfully disagrees with amendments numbered 2(b), 2(c)(ii), and 2(c)(iii)”; and ( b) replacing the words “agrees with amendments numbered 1, 2(d), 2(e), 4, and 5” with the words “agrees with amendments numbered 1, 2(b), 2(c)(ii), 2(c)(iii), 2(d), 2(e), 4, and 5”.
2016-10-19NayConservativeC-225 · That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.
2020-12-03YeaConservativeC-7 · Concurrence at report stage of Bill C-7, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)
2020-12-10YeaConservativeC-7 · 3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-7, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)

Elections

DateRidingPartyVotesShareResult
2006-01-23St. Paul's (ON)Conservative15,02125.77%not elected
2008-10-14Thornhill (ON)Conservative26,66049.01%elected
2011-05-02Thornhill (ON)Conservative36,62961.40%elected
2015-10-19Thornhill (ON)Conservative31,91158.60%elected
2019-10-21Thornhill (ON)Conservative29,18754.60%elected

Method

A ballot is a yea or a nay. Absences (810 here) and pairings (19) are recorded but are not votes, and every rate on this page divides by ballots cast, never by divisions held.

A dissent is a caucus dissent. Ballots cast while sitting as an Independent are never counted as dissents — an Independent has no party line to defy. The source dump flags 61 such ballots anyway; this site excludes them, and documents the artefact in correction 0001.

The record has edges. Memberships and Hansard begin 1994-01-17; recorded divisions begin 2006-05-08. A member who served before that date shows zero ballots because the record starts there, not because they never voted.

Alphabetical, not ranked. The directory sorts by family name. This site does not rank, score, or grade people.